Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [OM] Olydak

Subject: RE: [OM] Olydak
From: "Timpe, Jim" <Jim.Timpe@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2002 10:46:17 -0700
Couldn't be a whole lot worse than the D100 with assorted lenses a friend
let me play with last Saturday.  My hands were both aching after just a few
minutes of holding that beast.  My wrists aren't that arthritic yet... The
things enormous.

-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel J. Mitchell [mailto:DanielMitchell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2002 10:39 AM
To: 'olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: RE: [OM] Olydak


> Yeah, and what's a pristine 4t and Zuiko 24 shift going to
> set him back precisely???

 No, the truly uneconomic (but Zuiko-friendly) solution is to have the 4t +
24 shift, take the back off the 4t and put a bit of suitably semi-opaque
material in at the film plane, mount the Canon digibrick behind the 4t with
a flat field macro on it focussed on the 4t's film plane, and there you go.
(I think)

 Perhaps a bit awkward for hand-holding, though.
 
 -- dan

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz