No, that's a typo on my email. Mine's also 'revised' and it includes the
OM1n, not OM2n.
Tom
> Thanks, Gary. I note that your 1987 edition (like mine) does not have
> the 2n. Tom S. posted that his 1987 (10th edition) does have the 2n. I
> went back to check mine and noticed that mine is labeled "10th printing,
> revised edition". So, do we now have to have the 10th printing as well
> as the 10th printing revised to have a complete collection :).
>
> Chuck Norcutt
> Woburn, Massachusetts, USA
> -----------------------------
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|