Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 24/2 (was: [OM] 28/2 or 35/2?)

Subject: Re: 24/2 (was: [OM] 28/2 or 35/2?)
From: "C.H.Ling" <chling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 22:53:17 +0800
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Gries" <rgg@xxxxxxxxxxx>


> As always, great shots C.H.!  I am surprised at the distortion, but as
> you said, it is manageable in most situations.
>
> Though, I have to say that you could benefit froma 24 shift in some of
> those shots! ;)
>
>
> Thanks!

Thanks Robert! When you put straight lines at the edges you will see the
distortion, even the 28/2 is very obvious and the 50/1.4 does the same. Only
the macros and the 85/2 and up provide you no noticeable distortion. Oh,
yeah the 18/3.5 is exception low in distortion although not as good as the
macros.

C.H.Ling


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz