Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 24/2 (was: [OM] 28/2 or 35/2?)

Subject: Re: 24/2 (was: [OM] 28/2 or 35/2?)
From: "C.H.Ling" <chling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 21:22:08 +0800
Ok, here is some samples from my Europe trip in 92'.

http://www.accura.com.hk/OM/Z24.htm

The top left one shown the waveform distortion, that is the worse case you
will found and it can be avoided if more carefully when taking the shot.

C.H.Ling

----- Original Message -----
From: "C.H.Ling" <chling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> I mainly use it for people, there is waveform distortion, but not
> really that much. And if the line structure is not too long that
> extend from top to bottom you will not see it. Doesn't like other
> lenses with simple strong barrel distortion. Actually I have bought it
> to a Europe trip in 1992 with lots of photos back and you can imagine
> there are lots of building structure there, will show you some samples
> when I back home tonight.
>
> C.H.Ling
>
> plp@xxxxxxxx wrote:
> >
> > > ... snip ...
> > >I like the combination of 24/2, 35/2 and 85/2,
> >
> > C.H., what do you use your 24/2 for?  According to Gary's
> > tests, and the resultant firestorm reflected in the archives,
> > the 24/2 has significant waveform distortion.  This is no
> > problem if you shoot mainly landscapes, but I think it would
> > be a problem for shooting architectural scenes, both inside
> > and outside (probably worse for outside shooting, with lines
> > of bricks, windows, and such).
> >
> > Pete



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz