>I wouldn't rush into a 21/2. The 21/3.5 is a wonderful
>lens and while I do own the 21/2, I am not sure it is
>worth the extra money.
Does anyone else own both the 21/2 and 21/3.5, and can
compare their performance? According to Gary's lens
tests, both are excellent lenses. The greater light of
the faster lens sure would be nice, but at a cost. Just
how much better is the 21/2 over the 21/3.5?
Pete
________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|