Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] state-of-the-art technology

Subject: Re: [OM] state-of-the-art technology
From: "John Duggan" <john.duggan1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 23:45:46 +0100
Whohhhhhhhhhh! Olympus cameras lack customomizability  (what an awful word!)
:-)  Must be American English  :-)  When you see the extensive Olympus
system how can you say that? Also it surely makes sense to add the weight
and bulk of motorwind only when you need it ?
         Also I would much prefer a single shot rifle.Precise skill , not
the scattergun approach! :-)  regards,  John Duggan, Wales, UK.
----- Original Message -----
From: "William Sommerwerck" <williams@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Olympus group" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "J. Gregory Lefebvre" <jgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 3:15 PM
Subject: [OM] state-of-the-art technology


> I don't understand the remark that OM cameras "are still pretty much
> state-of-the-art." Multi-spot metering remains unique and useful, nobody
has
> ever made such tiny lenses, and -- sans motor drive -- OMs are remarkably
> compact and "hand-some," but OMs lack evaluative metering, integral
> motordrive, autofocus, and "customizability."
> I own a 50-gauge black-powder rifle that will kill any single (or married)
> person just as dead as an AK-47



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz