Olympus-OM

[OM] it's not a tUmor... 135/4.5

from Robert Gries

Subject:	[OM] it's not a tUmor... 135/4.5
From:	"Robert Gries" <rgg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 16 Jul 2002 15:04:11 -0500

I have a 135/4.5 whose rear element bulges outward.  From the section on
the e-sif, it looks like it shouldn't - is mine defective?


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] it's not a tUmor... 135/4.5, Robert Gries <= RE: [OM] it's not a tUmor... 135/4.5, James N. McBride RE: [OM] it's not a tUmor... 135/4.5, Robert Gries Re: [OM] it's not a tUmor... 135/4.5, Jim Couch RE: [OM] it's not a tUmor... 135/4.5, Robert Gries Re: [OM] it's not a tUmor... 135/4.5, Jim Couch [OM] it's not a tUmor... 135/4.5, Walt Wayman RE: [OM] it's not a tUmor... 135/4.5, Robert Gries RE: [OM] it's not a tUmor... 135/4.5, Timpe, Jim Re: [OM] it's not a tUmor... 135/4.5, AG Schnozz

Previous by Date:	[OM] Third-party lens repairs, Jeff Keller
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] cheap 50/3.5 on ebay, GeoW
Previous by Thread:	[OM] OM Pangerl, John Duggan
Next by Thread:	RE: [OM] it's not a tUmor... 135/4.5, James N. McBride
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]