Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] SC vs MC rehashed (again...)

Subject: Re: [OM] SC vs MC rehashed (again...)
From: "C.H.Ling" <chling@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 10:19:25 +0800

frieder.faig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 08:12:23PM -0700, Marten Beels wrote:
> 
> .  But this brings me to my question, how much
> > better is a MC lens then a SC lens?
> 
> There is only one definite answer:
> 
> It depends!
> 

Yes, in my experience the 24/2.8 SC is sharper than the MC, the 28/3.5
is also sharper than the 28/2.8. My S/N 5xx,xxx SC 50/1.4 is as sharp
as my S/N >1,100,000 but the 50/1.4 SC with S/N 3xx,xxx was very poor
at f1.4 when compared to the others.

Believe it or not, some SC lenses seems to have higher contrast then
the MC, like the lens I mentioned above. But backlight performance is
another issue, the SC are usually poorer. 

C.H.Ling

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz