This guy is making up for what he couldn't get for the 250/f2 (or was it a
350/f2.8?) that he was trying to sell to the list members. At the rate the
auction is going for him, he might just make up the difference.
Richard
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lee Penzias" <l_penzias@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 3:37 AM
Subject: Re: Re: [OM] Zuiko 50mm f1.2 cost?
> This one is up at $325 and it hasn't even broken the reserve yet. If I had
> money falling out of my pockets I might spend whatever it took to secure
> such an item in mint "as new" condition. Otherwise I'd happily stay with a
> 1.4 at even half the price.
>
> http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1348180009
>
> Lee
>
> ----Original Message Follows----
> From: Wayne Harridge <wayneharridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Conrad Vogel <conrad@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Is the 1/2 stop up from a f1.4 really worth it though? 1.4's seem to
> > go
> > for about $40 most of the time. I guess if the quality of the lens
> > itself is about 7 times better, then it would justify the price being
> > 7
> > times more.... ;)
> >
> I think it's called "the law of diminishing returns", occurs for just
about
> anything
> you might purchase.
>
>
> Wayne Harridge
>
> http://members.optusnet.com.au/~w_harridge
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|