Olympus-OM

Re: [OM] Wide Range Zooms - any good ?

from ClassicVW

Subject:	Re: [OM] Wide Range Zooms - any good ?
From:	ClassicVW@xxxxxxx
Date:	Sat, 6 Apr 2002 10:14:26 EST

If I recall correctly, (I don't own either lens anymore) the Tokina was a 5.6 
maximum aperture, but in all outward respects the lenses were identical- 
size, weight, operation, markings. What is the optical difference between an 
F/5 and an F/5.6 anyway?  (I'm serious, not trying to be funny, I don't 
know). 

George S.

chling@xxxxxxxxxxxx writes:

> The Zuiko 50-250 is constant F5, how about your Tokina.
>

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: [OM] Wide Range Zooms - any good ?, (continued) RE: [OM] Wide Range Zooms - any good ?, Timpe, Jim Re: [OM] Wide Range Zooms - any good ?, Tom Scales Re: [OM] Wide Range Zooms - any good ?, dreammoose Re: [OM] Wide Range Zooms - any good ?, John A. Lind [OM] Ultra Rare OM-1/2 MD cover, M. Lloyd Re: [OM] Wide Range Zooms - any good ?, Roger D. Key Re: [OM] Wide Range Zooms - any good ?, dreammoose Re: [OM] Wide Range Zooms - any good ?, Brian Swale Re: [OM] Wide Range Zooms - any good ?, ClassicVW Re: [OM] Wide Range Zooms - any good ?, C.H.Ling Re: [OM] Wide Range Zooms - any good ?, ClassicVW <= Re: [OM] Wide Range Zooms - any good ?, C.H.Ling [OM] Wide Range Zooms - any good ?, Andy Gilbert

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] Re: Old Zuikos sharper than new Canon Zooms?, Johnny Johnson
Next by Date:	[OM] Re: olympus-digest V2 #3280, Stephen Scharf
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] Wide Range Zooms - any good ?, C.H.Ling
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] Wide Range Zooms - any good ?, C.H.Ling
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]