Michael,
Thanks for your input. I used to have a 180 from N*kon and that was a great
lens too.
Cheers!
Mauler...
> I bought one locally for $299 last year. Excellent glass and moderate wear
> on the exterior.
>
> Excellent lens. I use it almost weekly shooting sports for the university
> paper. I haven't shot any color with it yet (I hardly ever shoot color
> film...) and _LOVE_ the wide 2.8 aperture. It can really blow out the
> background and make the subject stand out. Overall, its much better than my
> 65-200/4.
>
>
> on 3/17/02 10:28 PM, The Mauler at mauler@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
>> Folks,
>>
>> I like to seek the opinion of listers on how much I should fork out for a
>> 180/2.8. Cosmetic condition is average with marks on the barrel. Optics
>> appear clear enough.
>>
>> If there is anyone who thinks this is hands-off lens, I would appreciate
>> your opinions too.
>>
>> Many thanks-in-advance.
>>
>> Cheers!
>>
>> The Mauler...(my evilbay handle, with the space and periods)
>>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|