ML Archiv: RE: [OM] OT Metz

Olympus-OM

RE: [OM] OT Metz

from Robert R. Gries

Subject:	RE: [OM] OT Metz
From:	"Robert R. Gries" <rgg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 7 Mar 2002 15:16:54 -0600

I have tried, but it doesn't seem to be consistent...

<snip>

As for suggestions for Bob's dilemma - borrow a flash meter and take
some measurements to establish the true guide number?



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] 21/3.5 an interesting lens, (continued) Re: [OM] 21/3.5 an interesting lens, andrew fildes Re: [OM] 21/3.5 an interesting lens, dreammoose Re: [OM] 21/3.5 an interesting lens, frieder . faig Re: [OM] 21/3.5 an interesting lens, Larry Message not available Re: [OM] 21/3.5 an interesting lens, Richard F. Man Re: [OM] 21/3.5 an interesting lens, andrew fildes RE: [OM] 21/3.5 an interesting lens, Wayne Harridge [OM] OT Metz, Robert R. Gries Re: [OM] OT Metz, John Hudson Re: [OM] OT Metz, Ian A. Nichols RE: [OM] OT Metz, Robert R. Gries <= RE: [OM] 21/3.5 an interesting lens, Robert R. Gries Re: [OM] 21/3.5 an interesting lens, frieder . faig Re: [OM] 21/3.5 an interesting lens, W.Xato RE: Re: [OM] M-18r Control Grip, jamesfc@xxxxxxx

Previous by Date:	RE: [OM] Slight OM content (film), Malcolm Clay
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] OM1-meter problems - chapter 2..., John Hermanson
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] OT Metz, Ian A. Nichols
Next by Thread:	RE: [OM] 21/3.5 an interesting lens, Robert R. Gries
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]