Yes, but at $1500, his arguments make more and more sense.
Larry
"C.H.Ling" wrote:
> Glad to see you have found so many reasons for not buying a E20, I
> wish I had did the same to convince myself for not buying a E10 one
> year ago. What you said is just like medium format is not for me as it
> has no 500mm reflex, no 3 or even 5 frame a second, no 1/4000s. Or the
> IS-3 is not for me as it has no 21mm lens or adapter...or XA is not
> for me since it only has a fixed lens....
>
> I would say the E20 is just one of the camera you may need and nice to
> own. It is not something to replace your whole system. If you can wait
> of course you can always get something better in the digital camera
> world.
>
> C.H.Ling
>
> mcd3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >
> > Hi All
> >
> > Well, I took a closer look at the E20. It is quite an innovative product,
> > and I would love to find one on my porch one morning, but there are a
> > number of things that prevent it from being a solution for me.
>
> <snip>
>
> >
> > Depressing.
> >
> > Its not really a professional tool. But I do think that Olympus is getting
> > very close! Perhaps the next camera that they produce will be closer than I
> > think, and I cannot wait to see it.
> >
> > PMA anyone?
> >
> > Mike
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|