Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] IS 3 best for?

Subject: Re: [OM] IS 3 best for?
From: Peter Dixon <P.Dixon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 10:11:44 +0000
Hi Winsor, AG Schnozz

I have to agree with aggy (is this a suitable short form, your silver-noseness?
:-) ) - I have a 100/2.8 SC silver-nose and it has a unique quality. Often when running around excavation sites or ancient ruins I am dipping in and out of my bag for the 28, 35-80, 100 and 180 and sometimes others, and don't keep track of what I've taken with what. When the slides come back, I can usually spot the 100/2.8 pics, and on the rare occasions I take notes, I am usually right. My lens does have a "certain something". This dosn't stop me from lusting after a 100/2, but I do appreciate the qualities of the 100/2.8 SC

Oh, and it looks cool too.....

Cheers

Pete

--
---------------------------------------------------
Dr. Peter Dixon
Neurogenetics Unit, Department of Molecular Pathogenesis
6th Floor, Institute of Neurology
Queen Square
London WC1N 3BG
Tel: 0207 837 3611 xtn 4305
Fax: 0207 278 5616
Mobile: 0775 484 1984
email: P.Dixon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, peterdixon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
---------------------------------------------------


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz