| Subject: | RE: [OM] IS 3 best for? |
|---|---|
| From: | "Timpe, Jim" <Jim.Timpe@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 23 Jan 2002 13:49:21 -0800 |
I thought the SC version was more photon enabling than the MC ones, hence the connundrum... what to do with all that light (stray and all)... -----Original Message----- From: AG Schnozz Actually the other way. My lenses, being SC F2.8s instead of MC F2s are slightly "photon challenged". < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [OM] IS 3 best for?, AG Schnozz |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Zuiko 50mm f/3.5, Brian Swale |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [OM] IS 3 best for?, AG Schnozz |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [OM] IS 3 best for?, AG Schnozz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |