Indeed Doro, indeed... but then our worst fears about existence would
be confirmed. But, as far as I can make out, this philosophy
business is all about worrying about what might happen when we are
not looking... without actually seeing it happen and then being
really worried :>).
Chris
At 13:48 +0100 21/1/02, Dorothée Rapp wrote:
Chris Barker wrote:
experiencing it. That is the reason (probably) that SLRs are more
satisfying than rangefinders and the like - because the mirror
blocks the viewfinder for a time, however short, and when we get
the prints back we can see that the world (or that scene anyway)
was still there when we were not experiencing it. This is in some
ways reassuring.
but - maybe the universe would have changed *if we had looked at it :), right?
cheers
Doro
--
<|_:-)_|>
C M I Barker
Cambridgeshire, England.
+44 (0)7092 251126
mailto:imagopus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
... a nascent photo library.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|