| Subject: | Re: [OM] 24 (or 20) vs. 36 |
|---|---|
| From: | andrew fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 3 Jan 2002 19:52:14 +1100 |
>OK Scott. So now you're going to tell us you remember when you had to spread >a protective coating on Polaroid pictures, and they were black and white! >(oops, I remember....) >-Mickey Don't be ridiculous! You made that up didn't you?! :-) Sigh. AndrewF < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] re: [OT] why sleezy yucky zoom on new wonderbricks, andrew fildes |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [OM] Re: 24-exp versus 36 exp debate., andrew fildes |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [OM] 24 (or 20) vs. 36, Wayne Harridge |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] 24 (or 20) vs. 36, ClassicVW |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |