Olympus-OM

Re: [OM] Quick question about bellows macro lenses

from Giles

Subject:	Re: [OM] Quick question about bellows macro lenses
From:	Giles <cnocbui@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sat, 22 Dec 2001 11:03:16 +0000

Gary Reese has actually tested the 135/4.5 at infinity, what is yourbasis for this statement?


Giles

Of course, a normal
85mm or 135mm lens will give better images at the distant objects,



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
*Re: [OM] Yet another 24 Shift on eay*, (continued)* *Re: [OM] Yet another 24 Shift on eay*, Tris Schuler* *Re: [OM] Yet another 24 Shift on eay*, Allan Wafkowski* *Re: [OM] Yet another 24 Shift on eay*, Andrew Dacey* *Re: [OM] Yet another 24 Shift on eay*, Tom* *Re: [OM] Yet another 24 Shift on eay*, Gary Edwards* *Re: [OM] Yet another 24 Shift on eay*, Jim Couch* [OM] Quick question about bellows macro lenses, M. Royer Re: [OM] Quick question about bellows macro lenses, Bill Stanke Re: [OM] Quick question about bellows macro lenses, M. Royer Re: [OM] Quick question about bellows macro lenses, Jim Brokaw Re: [OM] Quick question about bellows macro lenses, Giles <=

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] Happy Chanukah to all those that acknowledge the holiday, Bill Owens
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] Digital Preview[OT], Mark A Thalman
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] Quick question about bellows macro lenses, Jim Brokaw
Next by Thread:	[OM] WTB: T-10 Ring Flash, Richard F. Man
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]