Re: [OM] Scanning quality

[Michael Darling]

on 12/6/01 8:09 PM, Henrik Dahl at hdahl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> Do you who have the experience notice a HUGE difference between
> scanned prints and scanned negatives? Or is the difference
> "neglectable"?


I have noticed that Tri-X printed full frame on Polymax paper and scanned at
150-300 dpi (on a relatively cheap Umax flatbed) is as sharp and has less
obvious grain than the same negative at max dpi on my newspapers'
CoolscanIII.





< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >