Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Olympus shift lens

Subject: Re: [OM] Olympus shift lens
From: "Stephan VAN DEN ZEGEL" <svandenzegel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2001 20:20:04 +0100
Schneider PC 28 is still available new in any mount you want... (they have a
website somewhere in germany)
there is also some russian alternative (on nikon mount) with tilt ability
and cheaper than the others... (think it comes from bielorussia)
I saw that on a german site...
Anyway an olympus 24shift is like a dream... I want one... but it's rare and
expensive...

But the rational way of investing, with only archictectural pictures in
mind, would be to buy a larger format tool like mamiya or others... or even
a small technical chamber... it would cost you less for better useability
(greater shift and tilt... and so on... ) You can find one complete for the
same price as a 24...

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeffrey R. Keller" <jeff@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2001 7:46 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] Olympus shift lens


> Looks like you could get a new Canon 24 shift and a used body
> for the price of the used Zuiko 24 shift. Do you know if the tilt can
> be locked? Wouldn't the DOF of a 24mm lens be great enough
> that you would never need the tilt?
>
> I bought a 35 shift after a trip to Yosemite. They definitely have
> use with plenty of things besides buildings.
>
> -jeff
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "M. Royer" <royer007@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2001 10:24 AM
> Subject: Re: [OM] Olympus shift lens
>
>
> >>>>>      Canon has a nice selection of lenses that
> > can tilt as well as shift. These lenses IMHO sacrafice
> > a lot more than the Zuikos in terms of portability,
> > useability, general feel, and IMHO picture sharpness.
> > They are clunky and heavy and pretty much restricted
> > to a tripod whereas the Zuikos are portable and easy
> > to use.
> >
> > If you go Canon why not just get a large format which
> > will give you the best options for architecture from a
> > tripod. Olympus, however, provides an option for
> > architecture which is portable and discreet while
> > Canon seems to try to emulate large format in 35mm but
> > they lose mobility and discreetness. In other words
> > Canon gives up many of 35mm's advantages while not
> > gaining that many of large format's.
> >
>
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz