Re: [OM] Tamron 80-200/2.8 vs Tokina's ATX series

[Larry]

Tokina is just less "famous". They're easily as good, or better and usually a
better buy.

Larry

"Ian A. Nichols" wrote:

> On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Clemente Colayco wrote:
>
> > If as you say Tamrons are unappreciated, can we say the same of Tokina ATX
> > series lenses? Is there a clear choice of what is better between Tamron SP
> > vs Tokina ATX lenses?
>
> They can't possibly be as good, because about 2 months after I got my SP
> 80-200/2.8 the Tokina equivalent went for noticeably less on eBay.
>
> ermmm  :(
>
> --
> ________________________________________________________________________
> *             |                                                        |
> |  /  | |/-\  |                      Ian A. Nichols                    |
> | |   | |   | |             http://www.chm.bris.ac.uk/~cpian/          |
> |  \-/| |  /  |                  i.a.nichols@xxxxxxxxxx                |
> |             *                    iann@xxxxxxxxxxxxx                  |
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> and   :
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >