On 28 Oct 2001, at 18:53, DAVDOU9211@xxxxxxx wrote:
> In a message dated 10/28/01 12:40:40 PM Pacific Standard Time,
> chris@xxxxxxxxx writes:
>
> Because I
> don't *really* need both cameras,
>
> You do too need both and you know it! You need one for 200asa film with a
> winder and one with 400asa film and a 35-70/3.6 and .....
>
> tee hee,
LOL! Why not one body for every day of the week? :-)))
Seriously, though, that's why I insist I'm not a Zuikoholic... I really
*DON'T* want one of everything. Either of the OM-2 or OM-2n will be
sufficient. I'm not even hot-to-trot for a 2S (sorry to everyone who swears
by them!). Of course, if I got a darned good deal one one, I wouldn't turn
it down or complain.
Regards,
Chris
---
I'm *not* a Zuikoholic.... I'm a Zuikohobbyist!
Chris O'Neill (chris@xxxxxxxxx)
http://www.joinco.ca
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|