What was disappointing about the 35/2? And what was so
nice about the 35-105?
Mark Lloyd
--- john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Oct 2001 05:48:49 -0700 (PDT), "M. Royer"
> <royer007@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >This topic is aobut what lenses one should ALWAYS
> stay
> >away from.
>
> My first SLR was a Soligor TM (made by Miranda) with
> M42 lens mount. I
> bought a Pentacon (E. German) 29mm WA angle for it.
> I think that must
> rate as the worst lens I ever had. It was
> mechanically "rough" and
> needed to be stopped down at least 4 stops before
> the image was
> anything like acceptable.
>
> I've found little to criticise in the many Zuikos
> owned by my sons and
> myself. The most disappointing was a 35mm F2 and
> perhaps the most
> outstanding is the modest 24mm F2.8. I rate the
> 35-105 zoom as perhaps
> the most remarkable performer.
>
> John Gruffydd (Mold, Wales, UK)
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing
> List >
> < For questions,
> mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page:
> http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
http://personals.yahoo.com
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|