Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] 35/shift vs. regular 35

Subject: Re: [OM] 35/shift vs. regular 35
From: "M. Royer" <royer007@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 04:56:54 -0700 (PDT)
Oh come on it can't be THAT bad. If the manual
stopping down is too much just leave the button
depressed and the apeture changes with the f-stop.
There is some loss of light, but not unbearable
amounts. The 35 shift is somewhat heavier and larger,
but not masiively so 180 vs 310 grams, less than a
35-70 3.6 zoom. I do agree with the other Mark though
on the 24mm, I have one and its not designed for
"normal" use.

Mark Lloyd

--- Mark Dapoz <md@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, M. Royer wrote:
> 
> > If you got the 35 shift I don't think you would
> need
> > the regular 35 since the shift can do anything the
> reg
> > 35 can and more with just a minimum of extra work
> (and
> > I mean very small amount) 
> 
> Besides being much heavier and bulkier, you need to
> remember to manually stop
> down the lens when metering and shooting.  It gets
> to be a real pain when
> you start using it as a regular 35.  I wouldn't
> recommend using either shift
> lens as a standard lens on a regular basis.
>                               -mark
> 
> 
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing
> List >
> < For questions,
> mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page:
> http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Listen to your Yahoo! Mail messages from any phone.
http://phone.yahoo.com

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz