Dear all,
Why not use a 28-48 zoom as standard lens with a 35-105 as
backup? Squeeze a 50mm 3.5 macro into a pocket , or if you have room a
Tamron 90mm f2.5 macro.
Regards, John Duggan, Wales.UK.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Scales" <tscales@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2001 7:04 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] Olympus 28-48 zoom
> I have a very confusing opinion of the lens -- and I own one. If the was
a
> 24-48, then I'd LOVE it. My problem is that choosing between the
> 35-70/3.5-4.5 and the 28-48/4, I usally pick up the 35-70. Now that I
type
> this, I may rethink that. My logic was I'd miss the 48-70 range, but
> honestly, I shoot a heck of a lot more wide-angle then short telephoto.
> The 24-48, combined with a 21 and a 75-150 would make an awesome kit.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|