Sorry about the orientation, I was in a hurry ;-) I should have been clear
that the flaw most definitely is in the negative & not just the print.
Surely someone out there can explain this...
Thanks,
-Dick
> Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 17:58:05 -0500
> From: "Gary Edwards" <garyetx@xxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [OM] stupid flash tricks: the photo
>
> First off, why have you glued your cat to the vertical part of your sofa?
>
> Secondly, it looks like a processing flaw in the print to me. Do you see
> anything in the negative?
>
> Barbatus
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 17:52:21 -0500
From: dtlocke <dtlocke@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: [OM] stupid flash tricks: the photo
Thanks for the suggestions regarding possible causes of a hot spot while using
flash. Here's a pic demonstrating the
problem:
http://www.flex.net/users/dtlocke/photos/badcat.jpg
This was taken quite close using a 50mm f1.4 with a skylight filter, and a t32
on a bounce grip. OM2n. I'm still looking for an
explanation as to what exactly could have caused this (and other) hot spots
from any flash experts out there... Thanks!
- -Dick, dtlocke@xxxxxxxx
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|
