Re: [OM] Re: How an Otherwise Lovely Photo was ruined

[DAVDOU9211]

In a message dated 8/9/01 7:43:50 AM Pacific Daylight Time, 
dsl33687a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:


> 

Thanks for the comments Bernd.  The flare is a flaw in the scan.  It isn't 
there in the original.  I don't believe the shot was overexposed as the negs 
are about the same density throughout.  I had metered the scene with my OM-4t 
before shooting with the OM-1. (The 4t had 200 speed film in it, not fast 
enough). I set the meter on both cameras on 800 and they agreed on manual and 
auto mode.  

I am pretty much convinced that heat was the problem.  

Dave