Have you had a chance to test it out w/ the 200/4? What are your
feelings about it?
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Doggre@xxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 3:11 PM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [OM] 200/4 vs. 2X-A (Was 100/2 vs. 85/2 in sharpness)
In a message dated 7/12/01 9:22:49 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
JamesBCouch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
> if you are looking
> for a longer focal length you can get a Zuiko 200 f4 which is also a
> wonderful lens for les than the cost of a 2x-A in equivelanet
condition.
I recently picked up a 2X-A for just a little over $100. Don't ask me
how.
Just *Bay dumb luck. It CAN be done.
Rich
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|