ML Archiv: Re: [OM] 100mm f2

Subject:	Re: [OM] 100mm f2
From:	"C.H.Ling" <chling@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 11 Jul 2001 23:34:48 +0800

Yes, almost a must have, it is the only F2 portrait lens at such small size. 
The 90/2
and 100/2 does not have the "small" character of Zuikos.

C.H.Ling

----- Original Message -----
From: "Timpe, Jim" <Jim.Timpe@xxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> Seriously... the 85/2 is one of my favorites.
>
>



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] 100mm f2, (continued) Re: [OM] 100mm f2, DAVDOU9211 Re: [OM] 100mm f2, andrew fildes Re: [OM] 100mm f2, John A. Lind Re: [OM] 100mm f2, Peter Dixon Re: [OM] 100mm f2, Jim Couch Re: [OM] 100mm f2, DAVDOU9211 Re: [OM] 100mm f2, C.H.Ling RE: [OM] 100mm f2 (35 f 2), Ángel Lobo Re: [OM] 100mm f2 (35 f 2), C.H.Ling RE: [OM] 100mm f2, Timpe, Jim Re: [OM] 100mm f2, C.H.Ling <= Re: [OM] 100mm f2, Walt Wayman Re: [OM] 100mm f2, Tom Scales Re: [OM] 100mm f2, Mike RE: [OM] 100mm f2, Scott Gomez Re: [OM] 100mm f2, Jim Couch Re: [OM] 100mm f2, Garth Wood Re: [OM] 100mm f2, Robert Winters RE: [OM] 100mm f2, Timpe, Jim Re: Re: [OM] 100mm f2, chris Re: [OM] 100mm f2, John Prosper

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] Gentle reminder from the digest, Garry Lewis
Next by Date:	RE: [OM] Which screen do you recommend, Beattie, or 2-4, David Bulger
Previous by Thread:	RE: [OM] 100mm f2, Timpe, Jim
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] 100mm f2, Walt Wayman
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]