My fathers F3.6 dried up and became stiff, so he
bought a 3.5-4.5 and gave me the F3.6 (free
zuiko....woohoo!!), I re-greased it and am presently
using it, but it is heavy, about as heavy as my OM4.
--- Tom Scales <tscales@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I
sold my 3.6 and kept my 3.5-4.5. Is the 3.6 a
> better, sharper lens. Yes.
> Do I like the 3.5-4.5 better. Very Yes.
>
> It is just so little and light and the pics are
> great.
>
> If you're a perfectionist, keep the 3.6. If you
> like small and light, then
> switch.
>
> Or, be a good Zuikoholic, and own both.
>
> Tom
>
> > Hi Folks,
> >
> > What are peoples opinions out there in zuikoland
> > regarding the differences between the zuiko 35-70
> F3.6
> > and the 35-70 3.5-4.5 (the really compact one)? I
> > presently have the F3.6 version, but I'm wondering
> if
> > its worth carrying around the bulky version, when
> I
> > could sell it and get a nice small one, is there a
> > major difference in imagine quality? (if at all)
> > Also are 49mm to 55mm adapters available to attach
> > 55mm filters onto 49mm threaded lenses? I've been
> > looking on Eb#y, but can't seem to find one at
> all.
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Chris
>
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing
> List >
> < For questions,
> mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page:
> http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
____________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk
or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|