Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] OM-4 vs. OM-4T

Subject: Re: [OM] OM-4 vs. OM-4T
From: "Mickey Trageser" <mickeytr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 20:46:02 -0400
Yep, the OM 4 and 4T have the same number of winder/motor contacts on the
base plate.
Mickey
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Scales" <tscales@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 8:19 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] OM-4 vs. OM-4T


> According to the eSIF, the OM-3, OM-4, OM-3Ti and OM-4T(i) all support
> motorized rewind.
>
> Tom
>
> > Walt -- Gee, That's the first time I heard that.  Are you sure?
> >
> > Craig
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Walt Wayman" <HIWAYMAN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 6:49 PM
> > Subject: [OM] OM-4 vs. OM-4T
> >
> >
> >
> > >From a recent discussion, I ended up wondering about this:
> >
> > >What are the differences between the OM-4 and the OM-4T(i)?<
> >
> > With the 4T(i) you get film rewind using the motor drive.  Not so with
the
> > 4.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
> >
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz