| Subject: | Re: [OM] OM-4 vs. OM-4T |
|---|---|
| From: | "Craig Henrikson" <chenriks@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 22 Jun 2001 20:16:25 -0400 |
OM 3 -- according to Shipman (Along with OM 4) Craig ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Charlton" <c_charlton@xxxxxxxxx> To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 7:33 PM Subject: Re: [OM] OM-4 vs. OM-4T > What other camera bodies in the OM series are > compatible with the rewind function of the motordrive? > > < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] OM-4 vs. OM-4T, Craig Henrikson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] OM-4 vs. OM-4T, Tom Scales |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] OM-4 vs. OM-4T, Chris Charlton |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] OM-4 vs. OM-4T, Chris Charlton |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |