| Subject: | Re: Collectible OM-3 condition-> was [OM] OM-1(n): mechanical |
|---|---|
| From: | "Tom Scales" <tscales@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 12 Jun 2001 19:00:35 -0500 |
Don't own'em all right now, but I've owned all of them except the M-1. Is that bad? Tom > You won't be 'complete' until you can say "I have an M-1, OM-1, OM-1MD, > OM-1n, OM-2, OM-2n, OM-2S,OM-3, OM-3T, OM-4, OM-4T, OM-10, OM-20, OM-30, and > OM-40, and I USUALLY use my... " > > Jim 8^) > < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: olympus-digest V2 #2468, DBellamy2k |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Close Up Lenses, Tom Scales |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Collectible OM-3 condition-> was [OM] OM-1(n): mechanical, C.H.Ling |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Collectible OM-3 condition-> was [OM] OM-1(n): mechanical, Peter Dixon |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |