Skip,
IMO, no. If size/weight is important to you, you already have the 100/2.8.
If hurt-your-retinas-sharpness is important to you, you have the 90/2. The
85/2 is a great little lens and performs well wide open, but you've already
got the important areas covered -- focal length, size, weight and sharpness.
D
>OK, I'm contemplating an 85/2, but I already have a 90/2 and the
>100/2.8. I know the 85/2 is lighter (by far) than the 90/2, but
>I'm looking for opinions. Is it worth the $150-200 for such a
>lens? How is the performance wide-open?
>
>Skip
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|