What again does SQF stand for?
Regards
Titoy
----- Original Message -----
From: Chris O'Neill <coneill@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Gary Reese <pcacala@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 6:49 AM
Subject: Re: [OM] [FS] Tempting??
> On 8 May 2001, at 7:55, Gary Reese wrote:
>
> > C.H. writes:
> >
> > << is a very good lens, but there are lots available on the market, this
> > one is a SC version, I would say $153 is a bit high.
>
> [Snip!]
>
> > I agree with C.H.!! :-) I tested a SC too late for inclusion on the
> > lens test page. But it is markedly lower in resolution and contrast
> > than the >200,000 serial number one, which is what I believe I have SQF
> > results posted for.
>
> I stand.... uhhh... sit corrected. :-) Thanks!
>
> Chris
>
> ---
> I'm *not* a Zuikoholic.... I'm a Zuikohobbiest!
> Chris O'Neill (coneill@xxxxxxxxxxx)
> http://www.nucleus.com/~coneill
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|