Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] 90mm f/2 Paired comparison: Zuiko Macro vs. Leitz Summicron-R 3-cam

Subject: [OM] 90mm f/2 Paired comparison: Zuiko Macro vs. Leitz Summicron-R 3-cam
From: Gary Reese <pcacala@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 18:45:01 -0800
Zuikoholics:

For those of you who always wonder if you really should have picked a
Leica or Leicaflex system, then here is something you might find
interesting. If you trust B+W filters, you might also find this
interesting.

The following 90mm f/2 Zuiko Macro test is a re-evaluation of the
results previously posted and will replace those results.

90mm f/2.0 Zuiko Macro (multi-coated)
OM-2000 with mirror and aperture prefire
Vignetting = C+ @ f/2, B at f/2.8, B @ f/4, A- thereafter
Distortion = none
Aperture  Center    Corner
f/2       B+        A-
f/2.8     A-        B+
f/4       B+        B
f/5.6     A-        B+
f/8       A-        A-
f/11      A-        B+
f/16      A-        B-
f/22      A-        B-
Notes: Moderately high contrast images at f/22; high contrast images at
f/2, f/2.8 and f/16; very high contrast images at f/4, f/5.6 and f/11;
extremely high contrast images at f/8. Paired SQF grade and contrast
comparisons to the Leitz 90mm f/2 Summicron-R test done on a Leicaflex,
with SQF differences significant at the 1/3 grade level. Lens condition:
9+ (KEH=Ex+).

versus:

Leitz 90mm f/2 Summicron-R (1978 era 3-cam)
Leicaflex with mirror and diaphragm prefire
Vignetting = B @ f/2, A- @ f/2.8, A thereafter
Distortion = slight pincushion
Aperture       Center    Corner
f/2 w/ filter* C+        C
f/2            B         B
f/2.8          B+        B
f/4            B+        A-
f/5.6          A         A
f/8            A-        A-
f/11           A         B
f/16           A         B
Notes: * = Tested with a B+W 010 filter. Moderately high contrast images
at f/2; high contrast images at f/2.8 and f/16; very high contrast
images at f/4 and f/11; extremely high contrast images at f/5.6 and f/8.
Lens condition 9+ (KEH=Ex+). Paired SQF grade and contrast comparison to
the 90mm f/2 Zuiko Macro test done on a OM-2000, with SQF differences
significant at the 1/3 grade level.

I can't explain what makes the Zuiko's edge performance improve wide
open. For raw image detail, the Summicron can outperform the Zuiko
stopped down, as well as show less light fall-off (vignetting) at wider
apertures, but the Zuiko has better performance at larger apertures
(esp. f/2) and less distortion.

I had a heck of a time splitting hairs, so 1/3 grade differences (ex. A-
vs. A) are pretty subtle. In fact, I had to cheat and use a 100x
magnifier to be sure.  But the grades are still directly comparable to
all the other test results I posted.

Regarding dropping some A grades in this re-evaluation: all posted test
results are subject to revision. That is what the S in SQF stands for:
Subjective.

Gary Reese
Las Vegas, NV


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz