Is the F 3.6 much higher in resolution than the f4?
----- Original Message -----
From: <rdk@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 11:58 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] Nice 35-70/3.5-4.5 Zuiko vs 35-70 F4
>
>
>
> From Gary Reese's tests, the f3.6 is only beaten by the 35-80/2.8; I am
very
> glad for my 3.6, but I expect that I would carry the 3.5-4.5 more (if I
had
> one!). Functionally the 3.6 is very nice, with the non-rotating front
element,
> and the lens hood that gives optimal coverage both at 35mm and 70mm. I
suspect
> that the 3.6 would last longer, as it was designed for professional use
(all
> those 300+ ball bearings!). I doubt that I could tell the difference
optically,
> unless it was a question of contre-jour, where the 3.6 lens hood would
give
> better protection against the light.
>
> mvh / regards
> Roger Key
>
>
>
> >How about comparison to the 35-70 F 3.6? Are they noticeable?
>
> >Regards
>
> >Titoy
>
>
>
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|