Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Film to flange distance in various OM bodies

Subject: Re: [OM] Film to flange distance in various OM bodies
From: HI100@xxxxxxx
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 03:28:23 EST
wincros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:

<< That is interesting information, especially to see the improvements 
 in design over time.  Are you also saying that Olympus did bad 
 engineering on the OM4T circuits when they designed it? 
>>
Hi Winsor,
               Design is always a compromise between conflicting 
requirements,engineering culture and part availability. The OM4 was actually 
designed a while ago when EEPROM pots were not available. Small serial EEPROM 
memory chips typically used for storing cal constants do date back to at 
least early '80s but were not available in 3V versions early on.  

Field calibration without special equipment by small repair shops may have 
been an important design requirement leading to putting in pots. 

Others mentioned on the list that CE mark versions of the OM3 use internal 
calibrations stored in memory but with no field programmable mode. To do this 
better  they could have put in a way of reprogramming the constants in a 
field service mode but they may have had memory constraints in the low 
voltage microcontroller they used. The OM4T does include a test program mode 
for field service setup of voltage levels, pots etc.  

Sometimes it is not possible to get away without some sort of potentiometer 
even where internal uP calibration is used. Usually you give up a bit of 
potential dynamic range to allow for component or sensor tolerance when doing 
internal self cal. Pots allow you to adjust for tolerance buildup to maximise 
dynamic range. In the case of the OM4 there is so little space inside that 
they use a single "jungle" analog chip for the analog functions this tends to 
compromise the performance of each of the blocks. With only 3V, avaialble 
dynamic range is likely to be much more of a problem. While there are now 
many more analog chips which run off 3V or less at the time the OM and OM2S 
were designed low power, low voltage chips were rare and of lower 
performance. This probably made it much more difficult to do an adjustment 
free design.

                  Regards,
                 Tim Hughes
                >>Hi100@xxxxxxx<<

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz