| Subject: | Re: [OM] Zuiko 50/1.2 and 55/1.2 Lenses |
|---|---|
| From: | ClassicVW@xxxxxxx |
| Date: | Tue, 16 Jan 2001 06:31:38 EST |
Yes, that's correct. George S. imagopus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes: << I always thought that the longer lens (the short tele) was used for portraiture because it offered less close-up distortion of, say, the nose in relation to the remainder of the face (than a shorter focal length like the 50, any 50). >> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Film Development, Ian A. Nichols |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Lycos Copyright Infringement, Hans van Veluwen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Zuiko 50/1.2 and 55/1.2 Lenses, DaEyeGuy |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] "Squiggles" in Tri-X, Barry B. Bean |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |