Chris,
Welcome to the world of Zuikoholism. As a, cough, cough, frequent
purchaser, I'll weigh in with my thoughts on a couple things:
- The OM2000 is ok, not great. It really isn't a 'real' Olympus body, it is
made by Cosina. I think you'll find most people on this list, including me,
would steer you towards a used OM-1,2, etc first
- The 35-70/3.5-4.8 that comes with the OM-2000 is, well, junk, compared to
the real Olympus lenses. For example, the 35-70/3.5-4.5 (confusing, isn't
it), is light years better (for around $125). Of course, the 35-80/2.8 is
the ultimate, but at $1000+ it should be.
- Ebay. Personally, I've had excellent luck. I've made almost 200
transactions, buying and selling, almost all OM equipment (some big things,
some little things). I've only had one poor transaction, where the buyer
just didn't understand the KEH rating scale and left me negative feedback
before contacting me. I worked it out to his satisfaction, but he didn't
know he couldn't retract a negative, so I am stuck with it. So, once you're
comfortable with the market prices and exactly what you want, you shouldn't
rule it out.
So that leaves us with where to get your first body (I'd suggest an OM-1 or
OM-2 personally, but make sure you get the flash shoe). People on this
list, the most knowledgeable OM people around -- I learn every day here,
often sell and trade equipment. It's ok to post a polite 'want to buy'
request, if you make it clear in the subject line. Give it a shot, maybe
someone will solve your problem for you <g>.
Hope this helps.
Tom
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Stinson" <music4free@xxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, December 31, 2000 2:58 AM
Subject: [OM] Everyone's opinion
> Hello,
>
> I've been *on* this list for a month or so, but I've never really said
> anything because I don't own an OM system...or an SLR camera...in fact, I
> don't even own a traditional film camera...I'm one of those digital
peoples :)
>
> I've *really* wanted an SLR camera for months, but they are so hard to
find
> (cheap, in good condition, in Edmonton) ... or maybe I just can't look?
>
> Not only do I not have a lot of money to spend, I don't want to try and
buy
> something on ebay 'cause I've had some bad experiences on the 'net with
> buying stuff...I know I know, but I like to think I have bad luck...so I'm
> a bit reluctant to try. I'd rather get something from around Edmonton if
> possible.
>
> I was wondering if anyone knew of any reputable places anywhere on the
net,
> or near Edmonton that sell new/used OM cameras, and also, which ones would
> be the best for taking photos...I know that's a dumb question...i know it
> entirely depends on what you want in a camera.
>
> I like the OM 2000 simply because it's cheap, but how is the image quality
> with the s-zuiko lens included?
>
> I've seen some pics with the 4t and 2s with zuiko lenses, and I was
amazed!
> Of course, a lot depends on the film and the photographer...but in each
> person's experience, which camera do you like, and why?
>
> This would help me greatly in my search for a *real* camera...digital is
> great, but there are limitations.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Chris
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|