Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Re Digital Vs Traditional Photography

Subject: Re: [OM] Re Digital Vs Traditional Photography
From: Larry <halpert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2000 03:07:58 -0500
First of all, I'm not selling anything, or making ANY money on stolen software.
I'm simply not affiliated at all with those websites. Period. Don't go to them,
and forget about them. And no, I don't believe that only the wealthier you are,
then you get the higher quality things. Wealthy software industry guys--> people
who can afford overpriced software: Its a nice little club. It just isn't that
cut and dried for me. Interestingly I've recieved a number of emails offlist
happy that I happened to surf across those sites, but your sarcastic disgust for
me is obvious. SO, I will mend my ways and make due with only the most
rudimentary software, being damn thankful I'm being permitted to use even that
with what I have to spend. I apologize for causing this to get this far on-list.

Larry



Mickey Trageser wrote:

> Larry,
>
>  I take it you would think it OK
> to take my photos, or those of any other list member, and sell them as your
> own. No big deal, go on with life.
>
> Perhaps you haven't thought of it that way. Give it a try. It's never too
> late.
>
> Mickey
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Larry" <halpert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Sunday, December 24, 2000 1:13 AM
> Subject: Re: [OM] Re Digital Vs Traditional Photography
>
> > Why so complicated?? Get it off the web for free....use it....make great
> > photos....go on with life.
> >
> > Larry
> >
> >
> >
> > "Michael P. Dodson" wrote:
> >
> > > on 12/23/00 4:50 AM, Gary Edwards at garyetx@xxxxxxxx wrote:
> > >
> > > > You're right, Hans.  Adobe would experience a lot less Photoshop
> piracy if
> > > > they sold it at an honest price.  Here are some other legal
> alternatives:
> > > >
> > > You are so right.  The other alternatives already mentioned are a better
> > > deal.
> > >
> > > > Second-hand copies of the previous version from users who have
> upgraded.
> > >
> > > Still not legal.  The upgrade fee includes the original license.  The
> > > previous "owners" no longer hold a license to the earlier versions once
> they
> > > upgrade.  They therefore have nothing to legally transfer to anyone
> else.
> > > Just because they have the old media (CD-ROM or floppy disks), that does
> > > mean they still have a license to use it after upgrading.
> > >
> > > Michael
> > >
> > > < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> > > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> > > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
> >
> >
> > < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
> >
> >
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz