Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Re Digital Vs Traditional Photography

Subject: Re: [OM] Re Digital Vs Traditional Photography
From: "Tom Scales" <tscales@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2000 20:16:29 -0600
I don't own an E10, but I do own a Kodak DC290. I also scan, scan, scan my
35mm.

You need something.  You don't have to choose Photoshop and there are a lot
less expensive alternatives, but you definately need a good editing program.

I would also suggest spending the $79 for a Wacom graphics tablet (comes
with a worthless cordless mouse).  If you really want control, this is great
for cleanup and doging and burning.

Make sure whatever you pick supports it though. Photoshop does.

Tom
----- Original Message -----
From: <DAVDOU9211@xxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2000 4:10 PM
Subject: [OM] Re Digital Vs Traditional Photography


> The question occurs to me:  Does not a digital camera in most ways dictate
> the color palet of the end result?  Or is that to be manipulated by the
> computer associated with the digital camera?
>
> When one buys film one can buy various types to achieve various
saturations
> and tonalities.  A very subjective area to be sure, but never the less a
> reality.
>
> If I buy a $2000 E-10  do I need to buy $350 worth of "PhotoShop" in order
to
> be able to achieve the palet I want vs, buying, for example, Portra vs
Gold
> and shooting them with proper exposure in my OM-2?
>
> Dave Dougherty
>


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz