| Subject: | Re: [OM] [OT] Sniping |
|---|---|
| From: | Scott Nelson <SNelson@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 15 Dec 2000 13:55:32 -0500 |
Oh, I dunno, Tom, your explanation makes sense to me. I've used sniping software
for some time and find that the psychology of bidders is such that a snipe saves
money both by avoiding bidding wars and proxy bid testing. I once put an elf on
a 50/2 macro, for example, and watched someone test my maximum over and over
again until he/she beat it. I'd have been better off with the snipe. I also find
that a snipe improves my bidding discipline and makes for a better night's
sleep. Of course, you'll often see two or more unsophisitcated bidders push the
price up anyway, but so what?
On the selling side, I've found that a low initial minimum with a reasonable
reserve catches more bids and results in more completed auctions at higher
selling prices then a unreservered auction with a high minimum bid. I believe
auction psychology (or is that psychosis) is at work here too.
<<The difference is that an early bid at that price almost guarantees your
highest bid price, as other people will bid to test your high bid -- pushing
you up. Sniping means nobody is 'pushing' against your price, so you often
get it much lower.
I didn't explain this well, but it has gotten me many bargains.>>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Putting foam into mirror cage......, Hans van Veluwen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] [OT] Sniping, Tom Scales |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Putting foam into mirror cage......, james olson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] [OT] Sniping, Tom Scales |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |