clintonr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>..................
> And I can also fault Olympus management for subjugating the
> photo/imaging aspect of the company to the Medical Instrument Division
> (see, "The Dark Side" in your program ;^). They seem to have forgotten
> "the horse they rode in on" - that many buyers of Olympus medical
> products were first drawn to the name "Olympus" by the superior quality
> and reputation of Olympus CAMERAS!
>
> Let's all hope that Olympus puts the horse back in front of the cart,
> and (to mix metaphors) that they discover a Mustang instead of an Edsel
> in their digital corral.
>
> But that's just my opinion....
>
Olympus is well known among industrial and medical for its metallurgy
and biology microscope since long time ago, their name is not
necessary bring by the consumer camera, though it may help.
C.H.Ling
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|