I've been trying the Supra as it's touted as 'designed for scanning', but I
don't like it at all. The 100 and 400 are ok, but take a lot of color work
to look natural, much more than the cheap fuji consumer film I've been
using. The Supra 800 is downright awful...so grainy the pictures are
useless. I'm back to the Fuji I can buy at the Walmart.
All shot with my 4T, of course.
Tom
From: "Gary Reese" <pcacala@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> My take on recent comments:
>
> Kodak Supra 100 negs come out the worst of any film in scans on my
> original HP PhotoSmart Photo Scanner. Without the software Tom Scales
> always suggests, you can't tweak the HP software for the emulsion type.
> FWIW, Fujicolor 100 (I think HG Super) comes out the best, closely
> followed by Kodak Gold 100.
>
> ProviaF is touted by Fuji as middle ground between the enhanced
> saturation of Velvia and the neutrality of Astia.
>
> Gary Reese
> Las Vegas, NV
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|