It's a interesting question.
Right now I have a Kodak DC-260 I use when I want instant pics, or need
ebay shots for example. Being not too experienced, I also use it quite a
bit to check lighting before shooting with a *real* camera.
Unfortunately, the quality is low so it's just a rough approximation of
what I'll be seeing on film. It's better than nothing though, and it's
saved me from making some dumb ( new guy type ) mistakes.
I'd ditch the Kodak in a NY minute if I could get a digital back for my
OM, even knowing the back would cost as much as several DC-260's. It
sure would be nice to have a digital camera with interchangeable quality
optics, ttl flash metering, etc... I can't believe there are so few OM
users that this would be an unsuccessful product.
--
Jim
Giles wrote:
>
> I wonder what reaction there might be if we were to poll the list of those
> seriously willing to pay for a digital back and then send an order to
> Olympus Japan for the requisite number of backs them saying we had heard
> they were available ;-)
>
> Giles
>
> John Palmer wrote:
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|