>A number of weeks back, we were discussing the Olympus lens shades for
the
>Zuiko 28/2.0, and wondering if those for the 28/3.5 and 28/2.8 were
>equivalent. I now have a 28/2.0 marked metal shade, a 28/3.5 metal
shade,
>and a rubber shade marked for the 28/3.5 and 28/2.8. The latter two
are
>largely the same in diameter and angle, but the 28/2.0 is definitely a
>different animal. It has the same depth, but the largest diameter is
about
>5mm more then the 28/3.5 shade - meaning it has a wider field of
view.
>
I think it is wider because the glass is bigger in the faster lens, not
because the field of view is different, which is a function of focal
length as I understand it.
Be seeing you.
Dirk Wright
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|