Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: RE:[OM] Available light vs. Flash (Was: New question)

Subject: RE: RE:[OM] Available light vs. Flash (Was: New question)
From: "Harridge, Wayne" <Wayne.Harridge@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2000 06:30:07 +0800
Tom wrote:

> 
> Hmm, food for thought. I'm not sure I agree with the crutch 
> part, but the
> fast primes are awfully useful.
> 
> Perhaps a compromise.  I'm starting the think that the 800 
> would do ok.  I
> think I'll go with the 100/2 on one body and the 35-105 (just 
> got it) on
> another.
> 
> So many decisions.
> 

Think about this one.  What sort of lighting is in the building ?  If it's
tungsten the available light shots will be yellow/orange (unless you use a
compensating filter) which doesn't look too bad, however if the lighting is
fluorescent the shots will probably have an overall green colour.  The lab
**could** compensate for this in the printing, but probably won't.  Flash
may be a safe bet for this situation, why not put a T32 on one body and
compare the results ?

Wayne Harridge
Ivanhoe, Victoria, Australia
http://www.geocities.com/wayneharridge/ 

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz