My comments below.
On Saturday, February 26, 2000 8:42 PM, atk@xxxxxxxxxx [SMTP:atk@xxxxxxxxxx]
wrote:
> Ok -- another question from a royal novice -- are there print films
> signifantly
> sharper than kodak gold 100 ?
Yes -- just about all of 'em. I'm partial to either Kodak Royal Gold 100 or
Fuji NPS.
> Also -- (unrelated) if you shoot with focal lenths 24mm to 90mm at 250/s
> to 1000/s how much degrading in image will you see if you don't use a tripod
> --
The longer the focal length of the lens, the more sensitive the camera will be
to camera shake.
> I know this is a vague question -- so what I mean is hand held camera shake
> on average (more vagueness) worse than the vibration from the shutter/mirror?
I certainly hope so!
> Unrelated (and even worse question) in gary test is the difference between
> an 'A' grade and 'B' grade visible in an 8x10 without the aid of a loop
> (I guess this question is specific to Gary since it is his subjective
> rating)...
Well, I'm not Gary. <g>
Dave
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|