Perhaps some of this is relative. A while back when discussing hi end HiFi
with an acquaintance, another fellow chirped in that he thought the Bose
Wave radio was the best thing he'd ever heard. Was he lying? No, he had just
never really heard high fidelity.
All the best,
Glenn Garza
>
>As several subscribers have noted from their personal use, magazine
>lens tests, and other private lens tests, the 200/5 consistently
>shows up as an excellent lens, fully comparable to the 200/4.
>
>I'm not sure why the 200/5 is such a burr under your saddle, and I'm
>willing to concede that you didn't like your lens. Maybe you just had
>a bad one. However, a search of the list archives will show that the
>200/5 users here have gotten excellent results from this lens, and
>test results support the conclusion that it is fully comparable to
>the 200/4. Further, its small size and economical price tag make it
>suitable for use when the "quality at all costs" 250/2 isn't an
>option.
>
>BBB
>-
>B.B. Bean - Have horn, will travel bbbean@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Peach Orchard, MO http://www.beancotton.com/bbbean.shtml
>
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|